Mysteries of Alpine-part 3
By Kurt Maechner
By 1924 a pile of rocks and a blocked tunnel allowed a small
stretch of track to hang on several more decades. So, where did the rails go that remained
between the supposed rock fall near the Palisades and the entrance to the tunnel? According to Ray Rossman, who has done so
much work at the tunnel complex, the answer is: the Forest Service. In 1959, they began the process of shearing
off the ties and rocks to make the road passable. Presumably, the remaining rails went as well.
The last set of untouched rails outside the tunnel, then,
were those under the collapsed snowshed at the west portal. I saw them on my visit to the tunnel in the
early 1990s. Rossman wrote that when the
snowshed timbers were removed, those rails were used as part of the recreated
track that now runs in front of the restored telegraph office.
Mystery #3: The Haunted Boarding House
I couldn’t resist the title.
The stone boarding house of the Alpine Tunnel facilities wasn’t haunted,
but somehow it was abandoned…long before 1910.
Most assume that the original boarding, or section, house
burned in the 1905 fire. It was at this
point that the C&S built the two story boarding house that stood so
prominently next to the small telegraph station. It only makes sense that this structure was
built to replace the burned one…except that it never burned.
Take a look at the bottom 1906 photo on page 282 of the DSP&P Pictorial Supplement. The engine house is clearly blackened and
destroyed from the recent fire. The stone
boarding house, however, is not charred a bit.
This picture lends an interesting clue to its story, though. The roof, while not burned, is nearly
entirely collapsed.
Rewind to the year 1896, one year after the tunnel’s
reopening. On page 280 of the same book,
one can see the roof of the boarding house in a significant state of
deterioration. No tar or shingles appear
either.
Let’s rewind once more.
Mac Poor noted that 1890 UP records indicate a “small section house” was
built. He gathers that this must be what
eventually became the station or telegraph office. So, within 8 or 9 years from the tunnel
opening, there was deemed a need to replace the stone structure. Why?
My theory is that the stone boarding house was used from the
opening of the tunnel through the first closing in 1890. The following years of idleness slowly
deteriorated it. Yet, there must have
been another reason why it wasn’t deemed worth fixing upon the tunnel’s
reopening in 1895. The engine house
certainly was rejuvenated. Was a stone
structure too cold? Was there some
defect in its construction? Was it too
small? The answers to these questions
may forever remain a mystery. Whatever
the reason, the company seemed okay to let it just fall apart.
Note: I want to express my appreciation to Hart Corbett who
brought many of the above details to light through a DSP&P forum
correspondence several years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment